"Hilda And The Modern Wee Wee"
An Essay And Expository
By Victor C. Nathan
With Hilda Hannah Humper we have a picture of the modern woman writ
large and liberated to such a degree that she almost seems
frightening in her autonomy. Hilda's autonomy is a rare and not at
all ubiquitous phenomenon even in this day and age of women's
liberation and the ability of women for the first time to admit that
they like and greatly enjoy the act of coitus without being
stigmatized or seen as promiscuous or "loose" in any way. With Miss
Humper this freedom is taken to such an extreme in her actions as to
almost make her seem like a self-caricature or a radical 1960s
throwback. It would seem that even many sixties free love radicals
would wince at some of Hilda's excesses and outlandish acts of
tawdriness. Hilda's affinity for wee wees is almost her singular goal
in life with little else that she pursues with such childlike
veracity. It is her childish nature that seems to define and embolden
her sexuality. Hilda's language is almost laughable in its infantile
parlor and exaggerated sweetness. This could be the key to unlocking
the reason for Hilda's inability to be shamed, embarrassed or even to
be, at the very least, made self-conscious by her actions. A baby or
small child is not in the least conscious of how their actions appear
to others. A little boy will fondle and stroke his genitals in the
presence of others and think nothing of it. Unless instructed by his
parents, he will continue unabated with this sort of socially
unacceptable behavior that is deemed private. This is much the same
with Hilda Humper. She seems to have no grasp of or concern for
society's mores or folkways. Like a child in both her actions and her
language, she is not bound by the limitations of the ego or the
superego. Hilda's rationality does not govern her actions, for she
engages in risky behaviors like guzzling the "wee wee juice" from the
squirting penises of the various strangers whose genitals she
hungrily sucks. Her thirst for semen is absolutely unquenchable. In
the story "Got Milk?" her wildly whorish actions that she is driven
to by nothing more than her bodily sexual appetites are quite
evident. In page one of the story, Hilda Humper recalls Christmas
time and the fun that she and her daughter Harriet had enjoyed at the
mall. Hilda recalls the memory with a fondness that brings wetness to
her pussy. "That night she and her buxom offspring Harriet had taken
the mall Santa Claus into a mall restroom and then let him fondle
their mammoth bosoms while they took turns sucking on his wee wee,
which had been substantial. The daring, the thrill of it alone had
been so enticingly erotic that it made Hilda wet just to think about
and recall the event in all its shameless sexual splendor. Just
remembering the young man moaning as he fondled her and her daughter
and the loud cries of gratification as he spewed his load on her
jiggling jugs had made it worth it to her." (Nathan, 1)
This passage is almost fantastical in its shameless grasping for
gratification. For a school teacher and her daughter to fellate a
mall Santa Claus and then have him ejaculate all over their naked
breasts is very risky behavior, both to Hilda's job and to her
health, though neither of these risks are considered by the amorous
busty blonde bimbo and her offspring. As Freud related in his
writings, this is the jettisoning of the ego and the superego to
follow only the base desires and cravings that the id exudes with
abundant rapacity. For Hilda to continue to fuck without commitment,
to suck only to savor and swallow ejaculate, is the epitome of a
liberated woman, a woman not bound by any ethical constraints or held
in check by any limits on her behavior. Freud would have understood
her behavior. Nietzsche would have applauded it, and deemed Hilda
Humper truly free. Aristotle and Augustine would have been horrified
by her libertinism. Hilda would have simply peeled down their zippers
and sucked their philosophical wee wees dry.
No comments:
Post a Comment